A personal injury firm’s intake is an SEO problem

A personal injury firm’s intake is an SEO problem

Written by

in

TL;DR

I have watched a firm spend a year improving its visibility while losing people at the front door, and the marketing was working the whole time. Odds of qualifying a lead drop twenty-one-fold between five minutes and thirty. At $183 to $442 a lead, that half hour is the most expensive in the firm.

I have watched a firm spend a year improving its visibility while losing people at the front door, and the marketing was working perfectly the whole time.

That is the uncomfortable version of this job. Everything I control ends at the moment somebody calls. Everything that decides whether the money was well spent happens after.

The number that makes it an SEO problem

MIT’s Professor James Oldroyd, working with InsideSales.com, analysed more than 15,000 leads and 100,000 call attempts across six companies and found a twenty-one-fold drop in the odds of qualifying a prospect when response time went from five minutes to thirty.

Five to thirty. Not five minutes to the next day.

Now put that next to what a personal injury lead costs. First Page Sage tracked 49 PI firms across 36 states and put the average at $442 through Google Search Ads and $183 through SEO. Their data, their clients, and they sell SEO. I quote it with that caveat attached and I am also an SEO consultant quoting it to you.

Either number, multiplied by a twenty-one-fold drop in qualification odds, is the most expensive half hour in the firm.

It also decides whether the case for organic makes sense at all. The whole argument for building search over buying clicks rests on a cheaper cost per lead compounding over time, and a lead that is never contacted costs the same as one that signs. Intake is the multiplier sitting underneath both columns.

Why it is worse in personal injury than almost anywhere

The caller is shopping in parallel. Somebody in the days after an accident is not calling one firm. They are working down a list, and whoever engages first has an enormous advantage that has nothing to do with quality.

The competition answers. The firms spending five figures a month on ads have staffed intake, because they have already done this arithmetic. You are not competing against nobody.

The calls do not arrive at eleven on a Tuesday. Accidents happen at weekends and at night. The hours when your visibility is worth most are the hours the office is closed.

What I check before agreeing a campaign

I ask to call the firm, from an unknown number, at a time nobody is expecting it. It is a five minute test and it has changed the shape of more engagements than any crawl I have run.

  • Who answers, and after how many rings.
  • What happens at 7pm on a Saturday. Voicemail is an answer. It is just not a good one, and it should be a known quantity rather than a surprise.
  • Whether the form goes anywhere anybody watches. I have found forms routing to a mailbox nobody had opened in months, and forms that had silently stopped sending after a plugin update.
  • How long a form submission takes to get a reply. Submit one and time it.
  • What the person answering can actually do. Take details and promise a callback, or start qualifying the case.

What I would rather do than sell a campaign

If the answers are bad, fix that first. It is cheaper than SEO, it works immediately, and it improves the return on every channel the firm is already paying for.

Doubling visibility for a firm that misses half its calls doubles the number of people who now have a poor opinion of them. That is not a neutral outcome. I have stopped campaigns over exactly this, in trades rather than law, and the mechanism is identical.

The part that is genuinely not my job

I can tell a firm their intake is losing cases. I cannot staff it, and I have no useful opinion on whether they should hire, use an answering service, or take calls themselves.

What I will not do is take the money, produce the leads, and let the firm conclude twelve months later that SEO does not work for them. It worked. It arrived at a front door nobody was standing behind.

The short version

  1. Everything I control ends when the phone rings.
  2. Odds of qualifying drop twenty-one-fold between five and thirty minutes.
  3. At $183 to $442 a lead, that half hour is the most expensive in the firm.
  4. PI callers shop in parallel and your competitors have staffed intake.
  5. Call the firm yourself, unannounced, at a bad time. Five minutes.
  6. Submit the form and time the reply. Some of them go nowhere.
  7. Fix intake before buying visibility. It is cheaper and it lifts every channel.

If a site should be ranking and it isn’t, that’s the work I do. Personal injury SEO covers visibility, and it is worth nothing without the intake behind it. If you’re not sure which of several plausible problems is costing you, that’s what an SEO audit is for.

Headshot of Mehul Dedhia, SEO consultant

Written by Mehul Dedhia

I’ve been doing SEO for about fifteen years. Most of my work isn’t building new websites. It’s figuring out why sites that should rank don’t. Local businesses, ecommerce and Shopify brands, affiliate sites, small brands and enterprise. If a site is stuck or has lost rankings, that’s usually where I come in.

Connect with me on LinkedIn